USPTO serial 78596801
INNOVAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPRUILL, DARRYL M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INNOVAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Foothill Ranch, CA
FOOTHILL RANCH, CA
FOOTHILL RANCH, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard C. Miskin
Howard C. Miskin Miskin & Tsui-Yip, LLP1350 BroadwaySuite 802New York, NY 10018Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Electric bag sealers; electric food blenders; electric can openers; electric glue guns; sewing machines; portable mixers namely hand-held mixers for mixing beverages and liquid food; electric peelers namely tools to peel the skins from fruits and vegetables; power tools namely alternating current or battery-operated hand tools, namely battery-operated screwdrivers; electric food processors; electric slicers for slicing fruits and vegetables | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Bakeware; vegetable brushes, travel mugs, teapots; tea sets; shower caddies; non-metal piggy banks; barbecue utensil sets, namely, forks, tongs, turners; cups; plates; bowls; picnic baskets; plastic bowls; bowl sets; bottle openers; bug catchers, namely, insect traps; portable beverage coolers; serving spoons; household utensils, namely, spatulas, spatula sets; soap bottles sold empty; soup ladles; non-electric coffee makers; canteens; perfume bottles sold empty; scouring pads; mops; kitchen scrubbers namely pot scrubbing pads; electric and battery operated lint removers; cooking strainers; rubber brooms; car dusters, namely dusters to remove dust from vehicles; cooking pans; salad tongs; frying pans; poultry cooking sets namely turkey basters; garbage baskets; cutting boards; sipper bottles sold empty; thermal forks namely barbeque forks with a temperature indicator; car seat coolers namely food coolers used inside a vehicle; vacuum bottles; plastic canisters | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Air hockey games; backgammon sets; toys walkie talkies; wind-up toys; dolls, doll houses; three-dimensional puzzles; soccer balls, baseballs; toy piggy banks; board games; black jack card games; bean bags; bubble gum banks; toy building blocks; magic sets; fish catchers namely fishing lures; puppets; pinball games; toy and educational science sets for children; paper and model playing kits namely toys of all types made of paper and paper model toys such as trucks and airplanes; electronic arcade-type video games; dart games; educational game machines for children; Hand held unit for playing electronic games; stamp sets, namely sets of toy rubber stamps for making impressions; stand alone video poker game machines; rolling hoops namely toys comprising hoops that can be rolled | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Innovage, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by INNOVAGE LLC
- Other trademarks owned by INNOVAGE LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named INNOVAGE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 11, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 9, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 31, 2007 | NAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2007 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 24, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 20, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |