USPTO serial 78596887
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis M. Heidelberger
LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER REED SMITH LLP1650 MARKET ST FL 25PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7394UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Augmented surgical interface control systems, namely, medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery and for use in the training and simulation of surgery; surgical systems with surgical equipment in the nature of augmented surgical interfaces which incorporate surgical instruments, medical tissue imaging apparatuses, surgical instrument motion actuators, position controllers and operator interface components, namely, surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery; medical devices for performing microsurgery, namely,medical apparatus and instrument for controlling the motion of surgical instruments within a surgical field, and surgical instruments for use in association with such medical apparatus and instruments; medical tools and instruments for use in conjunction with surgical procedures performed utilizing augmented surgical interfaces, namely, medical apparatus and instruments for accurately locating and positioning augmented surgical interfaces with respect to a surgical field; augmented surgical systems for assisting in the performance of surgical procedures,namely, medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery; surgical and medical apparatus and instruments in the nature of operator input medical apparatuses and operator displays that allow an operator of an augmented surgical interface to control the physical positioning of surgical equipment in a surgical field, augmented surgical apparatus and instruments for controlling the position of and moving surgical instruments within a surgical field, and surgical instruments for use in association with augmented surgical equipment;surgical systems for providing training and simulation capabilities with respect to surgical procedures using augmented surgical interfaces, namely, augmented surgical interface medical apparatus and instruments having internal capabilities for generating feedback to an operator simulating the displays and control feedbacks which would be encountered during actual performance of a surgical procedure using the augmented surgical interface; augmented surgical interface control system, namely, computer hardware and software and surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| May 30, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 29, 2008 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | RECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 2, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 2, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |