Drawing for NEUROBOTICS

USPTO serial 78596887

NEUROBOTICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
THOMAS, AMY E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NEUROBOTICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Louis M. Heidelberger

LOUIS M HEIDELBERGER REED SMITH LLP1650 MARKET ST FL 25PHILADELPHIA, PA 19103-7394UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Augmented surgical interface control systems, namely, medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery and for use in the training and simulation of surgery; surgical systems with surgical equipment in the nature of augmented surgical interfaces which incorporate surgical instruments, medical tissue imaging apparatuses, surgical instrument motion actuators, position controllers and operator interface components, namely, surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery; medical devices for performing microsurgery, namely,medical apparatus and instrument for controlling the motion of surgical instruments within a surgical field, and surgical instruments for use in association with such medical apparatus and instruments; medical tools and instruments for use in conjunction with surgical procedures performed utilizing augmented surgical interfaces, namely, medical apparatus and instruments for accurately locating and positioning augmented surgical interfaces with respect to a surgical field; augmented surgical systems for assisting in the performance of surgical procedures,namely, medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgery; surgical and medical apparatus and instruments in the nature of operator input medical apparatuses and operator displays that allow an operator of an augmented surgical interface to control the physical positioning of surgical equipment in a surgical field, augmented surgical apparatus and instruments for controlling the position of and moving surgical instruments within a surgical field, and surgical instruments for use in association with augmented surgical equipment;surgical systems for providing training and simulation capabilities with respect to surgical procedures using augmented surgical interfaces, namely, augmented surgical interface medical apparatus and instruments having internal capabilities for generating feedback to an operator simulating the displays and control feedbacks which would be encountered during actual performance of a surgical procedure using the augmented surgical interface; augmented surgical interface control system, namely, computer hardware and software and surgical and medical apparatus and instruments for use in general surgeryACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 22, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Oct 22, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Aug 8, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Aug 8, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED
May 30, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED
May 29, 2008CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED
Apr 10, 2008JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Aug 14, 2007RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED
Aug 14, 2007RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED
Aug 13, 2007CFRCSUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN
Jul 25, 2007ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 25, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jul 5, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 22, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jan 3, 2007RECGACTION GRANTING REQ. FOR RECON. MAILED
Jan 3, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Dec 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 12, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 12, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Dec 12, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Dec 12, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jun 12, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 9, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance