USPTO serial 78597727
VIZIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FATHY, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIZIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
IRVINE, CA
IRVINE, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Costa Mesa, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rexford A. Johnson
Rexford A. Johnson Zarian Midgley & Johnson PLLCUniversity Plaza, 960 Broadway, Ste 250Boise, ID 83706UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Radios, Radio Receivers, Radio Receivers with Clocks, Tuners, Audio Amplifiers, Remote Control Units for Receivers, Remote Control Units for Amplifiers, Loud Speaker Systems, Equalizers, Sound Recording and Reproducing Machines, Loudspeakers for Stereophonic and Monophonic Sound Reproduction, Speakers, Compact Disc Players, Compact Disc Recorders, Compact Disc Changers Used to Change Playback and Selection of Multiple Compact Discs, Remote Control Units for Compact Disc Players Electronic Home Audio, Video, and Personal Computer Center Servers, Projection Televisions, Liquid Crystal Display Panels, Micro Televisions, Television Receivers, television Tuners, Television Tubes, High Fidelity Sound Units Used as External Component Parts of Television Systems, Set Top Boxes, Color Temperature Switches for Television Receivers, Replaceable Fluorescent Television Picture Tubes, Electric Sound Recording Apparatus, Digital Video Tape Recorders, Digital Video Disc Players, Digital Audio Players, Digital Audio Discs, Personal Digital Assistants, Digital Encoders and Decoders, MP3 Players; Digital Cameras, Printers for Digital Cameras, Portable Printers for Digital Cameras; Portable and Handheld Digital Electronic Devices for Recording, Organizing, Transmitting, Manipulating, and Reviewing Text, Data, and Audio Files; Computer Software for use in Organizing, Transmitting, Manipulating, and Reviewing Text, Data, and Audio Files on Portable and Handheld Digital Electronic Devices; Headphones, Earphones, Headphones with Integrated Audio Players, Portable and Handheld Devices for Playing Audio Files; Wireless devices for communications, namely telephones, handsets, headsets, speakers, microphones, earphones; short-range radio global wireless-enabled devices, namely telephones, handsets, headsets, speakers, microphones, earphones | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by VIZIO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by VIZIO, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by V, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by V, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named VIZIO
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 25, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 13, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 13, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 5, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 25, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Aug 8, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 8, 2008 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 21, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 21, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 10, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 9, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |