Drawing for SONA

USPTO serial 78597953

SONA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MURRAY, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SONA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jennifer L. Whitelaw

JENNIFER L WHITELAW WHITELAW LEGAL GROUP3838 TAMIAMI TRAIL N 3RD FLNAPLES, FL 34103UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Art, namely art prints, photographic prints, color prints, lithographic prints, graphic art reproductions, art pictures, printed art reproductions, photographic art prints, photographs, and works of art, namely lithographs, prints, pictures, etchings, drawings, illustrations, and paintings; and postersACTIVE—
035Art gallery services; electronic and mail order catalog services featuring art prints, photographic prints, color prints, lithographic prints, graphic art reproductions, art pictures, printed art reproductions, photographic art, works of art, lithographs, prints, drawings, illustrations, paintings, and posters; and catalog ordering services featuring art prints, photographic prints, color prints, lithographic prints, graphic art reproductions, art pictures, printed art reproductions, photographic art, works of art, lithographs, prints, drawings, illustrations, paintings and postersACTIVE—
043Restaurant servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 26, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 24, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 11, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 15, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 15, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 2, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 28, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 28, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 5, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance