USPTO serial 78598186
PUDDLE JUMPER FLOATS INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 13, 2007
- Examiner
- DALIER, JOHN DAVID
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PUDDLE JUMPER FLOATS INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Puddlejumper Floats (1991) Inc. / Les Flotteurs Puddlejumper (1991) Inc.
Outremont, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Puddlejumper Floats (1991) Inc. / Les Flotteurs Puddlejumper (1991) Inc.
Puddlejumper Floats (1991) Inc. / Les Flotteurs Puddlejumper (1991) Inc.
Outremont, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Puddlejumper Floats (1991) Inc. / Les Flotteurs Puddlejumper (1991) Inc.
Puddlejumper Floats (1991) Inc. / Les Flotteurs Puddlejumper (1991) Inc.
Outremont, Quebec, CA
Other trademarks owned by Puddlejumper Floats (1991) Inc. / Les Flotteurs Puddlejumper (1991) Inc.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James R. Menker
James R. Menker Holley & Menker, PAPO Box 331937Atlantic Beach, FL 32233UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Fiberglass or synthetic resin floats for ultralight aircrafts | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Puddlejumper Floats (1991) Inc. / Les Flotteurs Puddlejumper (1991) Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Puddlejumper Floats (1991) Inc. / Les Flotteurs Puddlejumper (1991) Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Puddlejumper Floats (1991) Inc. / Les Flotteurs Puddlejumper (1991) Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Similar marks named PUDDLE JUMPER FLOATS INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 20, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Mar 13, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 11, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 7, 2007 | ISIR | WITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - TQR/NON-ATTY REQUEST | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 15, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |