USPTO serial 78598454
KEKO EQUIPMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 19, 2008
- Examiner
- EULIN, INGRID C
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with KEKO EQUIPMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas T. Johnson
Douglas T. Johnson Miller & Martin PLLC832 Georgia AvenueSuite 1200 Volunteer BuildingChattanooga, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automated and integrated apparatus for the production of electronic components and ceramic multi-layer structures, namely, tape casters, screen printers, tray handling systems, collating machines, isostatic pressing machines, dipping metalization machines; machines comprising ball mills, stencil printers, cassette feeding systems, stacking machines, pressing machines, cutting machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Maintenance and repair consultation for automated and integrated apparatus for the production of electronic components and ceramic multi-layer structures, namely, tape casters, screen printers, drying belt ovens, drying paternoster ovens, tray handling systems, collating machines, isostatic pressing machines, dipping metalization machines, customized machines made to customer specifications comprising ball mills, stencil printers, pressing machines, cutting machines, electrical test machines | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Technology consultation for automated and integrated apparatus for the production of electronic components and ceramic multi-layer structures, namely, tape casters, screen printers, drying belt ovens, drying paternoster ovens, tray handling systems, collating machines, isostatic pressing machines, dipping metalization machines; customized machines made to customer specifications comprising ball mills, stencil printers, tempering belt ovens, cassette feeding systems, stacking machines, pressing machines, cutting machines, electrical test machines | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HAIKUTECH HOLDING B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Jutib N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Jutib N.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Jutib N.V.
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named KEKO EQUIPMENT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 18, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 16, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 19, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 22, 2014 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2014 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Sep 4, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 19, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2008 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 10, 2008 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| May 28, 2008 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ICNA | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CORRECTION ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 1, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 19, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 19, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 12, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 8, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 15, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 27, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 25, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |