Drawing for AMINO VITAL REPAIR

USPTO serial 78598888

AMINO VITAL REPAIR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DALIER, JOHN DAVID
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AMINO VITAL REPAIR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

PERLA M. KUHN

HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLPONE BATTERY PARK PLZNEW YORK, NY 10004-1482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Nutritional supplements, food supplements not for medical purposes, meal replacement drinks, and meal replacement bars, all containing amino acids; amino acids formed and packaged as barsACTIVE—
029Protein based, nutrient-dense snack bars containing amino acidsACTIVE—
030Cereal based, nutrient-dense snack bars containing amino acidsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 4, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Dec 4, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 16, 2006EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jul 10, 2006RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jul 10, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Jun 22, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 22, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 15, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 25, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 14, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance