USPTO serial 78598905
GAKIC-TECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GAKIC-TECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Mississauga, Ontario, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food supplements for body building, food and sport nutritional supplements for strength and performance enhancement; food supplements in the form of powdered drinks, nutritional snack bars, shakes; ingredient blend in nutritional supplements, nutritional powder mixes; and related goods, energy drinks; vitamin supplement in liquid form, nutritional beverages; meal replacement drinks; meal replacement drink mix; nutritional supplements | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 13, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 11, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 11, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 10, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |