CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for COFFEE BULLET

USPTO serial 78599100

COFFEE BULLET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with COFFEE BULLET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

E. Blair Forrest

E. Blair Forrest Pushor Mitchell LLP301 - 1665 Ellis StreetKelowna, V1Y 2B3CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011electric coffee makersACTIVE—
030coffeeACTIVE—
035merchandising packaging, namely, coffee packagingACTIVE—
040coffee roasting and processingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 29, 2009MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Apr 29, 2009ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 28, 2009ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 28, 2009CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 27, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2008GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 8, 2008CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 8, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 6, 2008GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2008GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 6, 2008CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 5, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 4, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2008ERSITEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED—
Jun 4, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 4, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 12, 2007GNS2NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 12, 2007CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 26, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Jul 11, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 11, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 12, 2007GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2007GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2007CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jun 11, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 24, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 30, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
May 30, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 30, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 30, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 11, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 31, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 27, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 6, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance