USPTO serial 78599196
Serial No. 78599196
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PERRY, KIMBERLY B
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 78599196?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jack Smugler
AMANDA H WILCOX HAHN LOESER & PARKS LLPONE GOJO PLZ STE 300AKRON, OH 44311-1076UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely foundation make up, compact face make up, face powder, pressed powder, blush, cover up creams, concealers, eye shadows, eye liners, eye pencils, eye treatments in the form of creams, gels and lotions; lip products, namely lipsticks, lip colour, lip tint, lip gloss, lip glaze, lip pencils, lip liners, lip balms, lip shine, and lip conditioner, mascara, lash tints, lash enhancers, lash primers, brow pencils, brow moisturizing cream, gel and lotion; nail care preparations and tools, namely nail lacquer, nail polish, nail polish remover, nail treatments, cuticle removers, nail scissors, nail files and emery boards; skin masks, toners, tonics, clarifiers and refreshers; soaps for personal use, skin cleansers, face and body powders for personal use, bath and shower skin preparations, bath oils, bath salts, bath beads, bath gels, bath grains, bath soak, bubble bath, sun screen preparations, sun block preparations; skin bronzer creams, lotions and gels; bronzing sticks, bronzing powders, after-sun soothing and moisturizing preparations; pre-shave and after shave lotions, creams, balms, splashes and gels; shaving cream, shaving gel, cosmetic bags and cases, sold empty; skin care preparations, skin care treatment preparations, facial moisturizers, facial cleansers, face creams, face lotions, face gels, eye creams, lotions and gels; skin cleansing lotions, skin cleansing creams, skin cleansing gels, facial scrub, non-medicated anti-wrinkle creams, lotions and gels, exfoliating soaps, scrubs, creams, lotions, gels and oils; non-medicated skin repair creams, lotions and gels; hand cream, body cream, body lotion, body gel, body oil, body powder, body toners, body cleansers, body sprays and body washes, non-medicated skin renewal creams, lotions and gels; skin refreshers, makeup removers, eye makeup remover, personal deodorants and antiperspirants, moisturizing lotions and creams for the face and body, astringents, skin tonics, talcum powder; perfumery, namely perfume, eau de perfume, eau de toilette, cologne and essential oils for personal use, scented oils, fragranced body lotions, fragranced body creams and fragranced body powders. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 24, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 24, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 28, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 15, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 26, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |