USPTO serial 78599423
MIRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PRATER, JILL I
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MIRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Helen Hill Minsker
FELISE FEINGOLD BROOKS ECKERD PHARMACY50 SERVICE AVEWARWICK, RI 02886UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Bath salts, essential oils, foaming bath cream, creamy body cleanser, body scrubs, massage oil, body moisturizer, body cream, facial moisturizer, facial cleansing gel, facial lotions; facial tonics, face exfolient scrubs; non-medicated skin cleaning preparations and non-medicated bath preparations, namely, shower gels, body lotions and honey bath wash; emery boards; smoothing blocks in the nature of pumice stones for personal use; cuticle removing preparations | ACTIVE | Jul 28, 2003 |
| 008 | Manicure and pedicure implements, namely, nail files, nail buffers, cuticle removers in the nature of cuticle scissors, nippers, cuticle pushers, nail clippers, nail scissors, cuticle scissors, manicure sticks that functions as cuticle removers, callus and corn shavers, replacement blades for callus and corn shavers, ceramic foot scissors; barber hair culling shears; eyelash curlers; tweezers; safety scissors; mustache and beard scissors | ACTIVE | Jul 28, 2003 |
| 021 | Loofa sponges; mesh bath poofs in the nature of bath sponges | ACTIVE | Jul 28, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Eckerd Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by EDC LICENSING, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named MIRA
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 15, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 1, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |