USPTO serial 78599440
GPRDIGITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FISHER, LATONIA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GPRDIGITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Bern-Liebefeld, CH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott Q. Vidas
Scott Q. Vidas Vidas, Arrett & Steinkraus P.A.6640 Shady Oak Rd.Suite 400Eden Prairie, MN 55344Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Protective helmets for sports; protective bicycle and motorcycle helmets; goggles for sports; anti-glare glasses; MP3-players; CD-players; DVD-players; videotape recorders; DVD-recorders; videodisc players; video cameras; radios; televisions; computer and video monitors; sound recording and reproduction machines, namely tape recorders; telephones; bicycle and motorcycle computers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 23, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 24, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 6, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |