Drawing for FINESTRESTAURANTS.COM

USPTO serial 78599807

FINESTRESTAURANTS.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHOSHO II, ERNEST
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FINESTRESTAURANTS.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott J. Fields

SCOTT J FIELDS NATIONAL IP RIGHTS CTR LLC550 TOWNSHIP LINE RD STE 400BLUE BELL, PA 19422-2726UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035internet restaurant directory servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 1, 2013MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 1, 2013EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 5, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 11, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jun 8, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Apr 23, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 26, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 26, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Dec 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 18, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 18, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Dec 18, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 16, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 31, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
May 14, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 31, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 29, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 7, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance