USPTO serial 78600175
LOW-RANGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3115505Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 11, 2006
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with LOW-RANGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arpiar G. Saunders, Jr.
ARPIAR G SAUNDERS JR SHAHEEN & GORDON PAPO BOX 2703107 STORRS STCONCORD, NH 03302-2703Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Magazine dedicated to issues and activities relating to off-road motor vehicles, namely 4-wheel drive vehicles | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 18, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 27, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 18, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 16, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 21, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 21, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 5, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 29, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |