USPTO serial 78600196
CALLCHASERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CALLCHASERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Debra Serota
DEBRA S SEROTA, ESQ FISH & RICHARDSONPO BOX 1022MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications software and hardware used to manage, direct, route, transmit and receive telephone calls, electronic messages and audio and data signals over computer networks and telecommunications access lines; telephone equipment; namely, automated attendant apparatus and computer software for automatically answering telephone calls; automatic call distribution systems and virtual PBX systems for use in telecommunications management, enabling voice mail, facsimile receipt, facsimile transmission, electronic mail, the receipt and delivery of electronic messages, the receipt and delivery of electronic documents, the electronic receipt and delivery of images, electronic transmission of data, call routing, call queuing functionality and voice over IP (VOIP) | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Business and personal telecommunications services, namely, providing custom telephone call processing and management services, call notification services, calling features, call identification, call screening, call sequencing, call announcement, call blocking, priority call, call forwarding, call waiting, voice mail services, electronic transmission of voice mail messages; providing and leasing telecommunications connections to a global computer network; virtual private network (VPN) services; telecommunications services, namely, providing Voice over IP (VOIP) technology to allow voice, data and fax transmissions to be made over an Internet Protocol-based global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 29, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |