USPTO serial 78600912
SANTEC COMMUNICATIONS INTERCONNECTING THE WORLD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3200510Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 23, 2007
- Examiner
- WELLS, CHRISTOPHER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SANTEC COMMUNICATIONS INTERCONNECTING THE WORLD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence D. Mandel
LAWRENCE D. MANDEL GERTNER MANDEL & PESLAK, LLCPO Box 499LAKEWOOD, NJ 08701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ROUTERS, SWITCHES, ACCESS POINTS FOR WIRELESS NETWORKS, BRIDGES FOR WIRELESS NETWORKS, NETWORK MODULES FOR DIFFERENT CONNECTIVITY INTERFACES, NAMELY, T1 INTERFACE, E1 INTERFACE, DS3 INTERFACE, HSSI INTERFACE, V.35 INTERFACE, X21 INTERFACE, RS232 INTERFACE, X25 INTERFACE, FRAME RELAY, CABLE MODEM CONNECTIONS, DSL CONNECTIONS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2003 |
| 037 | NETWORK INSTALLATION SERVICES; NETWORK INSTALLATION SERVICES FOR DATA, VOICE, AND VIDEO SYSTEMS; WIRELESS NETWORK INSTALLATION; NETWORK MAINTENANCE AND NETWORK MAINTENANCE CONSULTATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2003 |
| 038 | VOICE OVER INTERNET PROTOCOL NETWORK CONSULTING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2003 |
| 042 | NETWORK DESIGN SERVICES; NETWORK CONFIGURATION SERVICES; NETWORK CONFIGURATION SERVICES FOR DATA, VOICE, AND VIDEO INTEGRATION AND CONFIGURATION; WIRELESS NETWORK CONFIGURATION | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Santec Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Santec Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Santec Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SANTEC COMMUNICATIONS INTERCONNECTING THE WORLD
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2017 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 23, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 31, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2010 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2010 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| May 23, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2007 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 23, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |