Drawing for N2ITROLAB PPMS

USPTO serial 78601015

N2ITROLAB PPMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRIEDMAN, HOWARD
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with N2ITROLAB PPMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence A. Maxham

LAWRENCE A MAXHAM THE MAXHAM FIRM9330 SCRANTON RD STE 350SAN DIEGO, CA 92121UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Analytical instruments not for medical use for the analysis of the physical attributes of materials using inductive, calorimetric, and magneto-resistive sensors; analytical instruments not for medical use for analysis, instant analysis, analysis of solid, liquid, and powder samples; analytical instruments, namely magnetometers, susceptometers, calorimeters, electron and thermal transport measurement apparatusACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 4, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 6, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 26, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 9, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 18, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 27, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 27, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 21, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jul 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jul 17, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jul 17, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 10, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 14, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 14, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 6, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance