USPTO serial 78601078
BMOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BMOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
St. Laurent, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George R. Mosher
GEORGE R MOSHER BROOKS KUSHMAN PC1000 TOWN CTR FL 22SOUTHFIELD, MI 48075-1183UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | BAGS, NAMELY DUFFEL BAGS, TOTE BAGS AND SHOULDER BAGS; LUGGAGE; BACKPACKS | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | CLOTHING, NAMELY COATS, JEANS, SWEATERS, T-SHIRTS, BLOUSES, SHIRTS, SHORTS, PANTS, SKIRTS, DRESSES, JUMPSUITS, OVERALLS, SHORTALLS, SWIMWEAR, VESTS; FLEECES, NAMELY FLEECE TOPS, FLEECE PANTS AND FLEECE ATHLETIC SUITS; JACKETS, RAINWEAR; SNOWWEAR, NAMELY SNOWSUITS AND WINTER JACKETS; HATS; EAR MUFFS; SCARVES; BELTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 17, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |