USPTO serial 78601120
APPARENET VOICE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APPARENET VOICE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Heidi L. Sachs
HEIDI L SACHS PERKINS COIE LLP1201 3RD AVE STE 4800SEATTLE, WA 98101-3099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Performance diagnostics, monitoring and analysis software for computer networks on which voice-over-internet protocol applications are used | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications consulting, namely, monitoring and analysis of telecommunications networks used with voice over internet protocol applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting in the field of technical support of voice over internet protocol computer networks, namely, performance monitoring, diagnosing of computer network errors, and computer network optimization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Apparent Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Apparent Networks, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named APPARENET VOICE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2016 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 23, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 23, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 22, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 10, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 26, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 23, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2006 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |