Drawing for EASY GOURMET

USPTO serial 78601910

EASY GOURMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STINE, DAVID
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EASY GOURMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kirt S. O'Neill

KIRT S ONEILL AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLPPO BOX 12870SAN ANTONIO, TX 78212-0870UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Shelf-stable, microwaveable food items, namely, entrees, casseroles, side dishes, Chinese-style stir fry food, chili, stews, breakfast entrees, sauces, soups, and dessertsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Nov 8, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Nov 8, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
May 9, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 12, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance