USPTO serial 78602738
LAN, EXCELLENCE IN FLIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YONTEF, DAVID ERIC
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LAN, EXCELLENCE IN FLIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frederick H. Rabin
Frederick H. Rabin Fish & Richardson P.C.P.O. Box 1022Minneapolis, MN 55440-1022UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 039 | Freight transportation by land vehicles, ships and aircraft of goods, documents and articles; transportation of people by land vehicles, ships and aircraft; warehousing services, namely, storage, cargo loading and unloading, distribution, packaging and packing, and shipping of packages, raw materials, documents and other freight by land vehicles, ships and aircraft | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 29, 2008 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 14, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 13, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |