CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MESOPOTAMIAN COTTON

USPTO serial 78603383

MESOPOTAMIAN COTTON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MESOPOTAMIAN COTTON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John F. A. Earley III

JOHN F A EARLEY III HARDING, EARLEY, FOLLMER & FRAILEY86 THE COMMONS AT VALLEY FORGE E 128VALLEY FORGE, PA 19482-0750UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
024Bath towels, hand towels, wash clothsACTIVE—
025RobesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 12, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 18, 2010EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED—
Mar 17, 2010EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 15, 2010MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2010EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 16, 2009EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2009EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Mar 20, 2009EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 16, 2009MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2009EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 16, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 12, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 4, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 4, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Jul 1, 2008PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Jun 26, 2008APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Jun 19, 2008PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 19, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 14, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 14, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 11, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 11, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 19, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 30, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 17, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 26, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 16, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 12, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 17, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 21, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 14, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance