USPTO serial 78603874
EPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with EPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Shinchuan, Taipei County, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Brown
MICHAEL F BROWN BROWN & MICHAELS PC400 M&T BANK BLDG 118 N TIOGA STITHACA, NY 14850UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | blank compact disks; prerecorded compact disks containing computer programs for use in database management in the field of database management; magnetic encoded cards for indentification; light emitting diodes; laser disks featuring music and data; pre-paid telephone calling cards, magnetically encoded; magnetically encoded credit and debit cards; video conference apparatus, namely, computer operating software, video receivers, video transmitters, video cameras, video display monitors, audio speakers and microphones; projectors, namely, video projectors, photographic projectors, slide projectors, overhead projectors, liquid crystal projectors; computer monitors; optical lenses; rear projection screens; projection screens; rear projection televisions; field sequential color wheels, sequential color recapture color wheels, total internal reflection prisms, gradient dichroic filters, dichroic filters, infrared-ultraviolet cut filters and light integration rods; computer components, magnetically encoded cards for automatic teller machines; blank DVDs; optical disks; twin image projection screens; microdisplay screens; front projection screens; compact disk duplicators; DVD duplicators; electronic duplicators for computer-readable media; digital network routers; modems; HPNA (home phone line network alliance) compatible networking interface hardware; apparatus for VDSL (digital video subscriber line), namely VDSL modems and VDSL computer-to-telephone line interface hardware | ACTIVE | Nov 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 30, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |