USPTO serial 78604036
ROBOTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KUNG, KAELIE ELIZABETH
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROBOTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Arlen L. Olsen
ARLEN L OLSEN SCHMEISER, OLSEN & WATTS22 CENTURY HILL DR STE 302LATHAM, NY 12110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Automatic machine tools for use in the appliance, automotive, truck transportation, building and construction, plastics, stampings, aerospace, telecommunications, EMI/RFI shielding, and electronics industries; industrial dispensing system for use with adhesives, sealants and other fluid materials, comprised of cartesian coordinate dispensing machines and articulated arm machines; industrial material delivery systems, comprised of metering systems, supply pumps, material pressure monitoring, tip calibration maintenance and and check, mixer and proportioner, and paste dispensing, components and accessories for use therewith, namely, bead inspection, conveyors, pick and place, dial tables and part fixturing, and surface compliance programming and equipment | ACTIVE | Sep 8, 1972 |
| 011 | Industrial curing ovens for curing and cooling dispensing adhesives, sealants and other fluid materials | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 16, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 16, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 9, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 9, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 3, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |