Drawing for MAXPOWER

USPTO serial 78604393

MAXPOWER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
FINE, STEVEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAXPOWER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Hector C. Perez

HECTOR C PEREZ YOUNGER & ASSOCIATES10681 FOOTHILL BLVD STE 280RANCHO CUCAMONGA, CA 91730UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007New and remanufactured alternators, starter motors and generators for imported and domestic automotive vehicles and light trucksACTIVE
012New and remanufactured constant velocity drive shafts for imported and domestic automotive vehicles and light trucksACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 24, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 22, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED
Sep 5, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED
Aug 8, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jul 19, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 21, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 16, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 14, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Feb 17, 2006CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED
Feb 17, 2006CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Feb 17, 2006CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Jan 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 13, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 13, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 3, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
May 19, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 16, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Apr 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance