Drawing for VESDA LASERTEKNIC

USPTO serial 78604626

VESDA LASERTEKNIC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
โ€”
Examiner
FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VESDA LASERTEKNIC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

Mark I. Peroff KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART PRESTON GATES ELLIS LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022-6030UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic air pollution monitoring systems, comprised of lasers, computer hardware and software used to monitor air pollution, and detect particles, gas, biohazards, smoke and fire, and parts therefor; electronic control fire alarm systems, comprised of computer hardware and software, electronic controls, input and output devices, namely fire alarm control panels, environmental monitoring and control panels and parts therefor, air pollution monitors, particle detectors, gas detectors, biohazards detectors, smoke detectors, fire detectors, all containing lasersACTIVEโ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited ยง2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 8, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 8, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDโ€”
Nov 13, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDโ€”
Nov 13, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 15, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline โ€” usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 20, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 31, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATIONโ€”
Dec 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETEDโ€”
Dec 28, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERโ€”
Dec 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
Dec 26, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEโ€”
Nov 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
Nov 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Jun 21, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLYโ€”
Jun 9, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 8, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTEREDโ€”
May 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEโ€”
May 8, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVEDโ€”
Nov 10, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERโ€”
Apr 15, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDโ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance