USPTO serial 78605575
IZZO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOUDERS, MICHAEL J
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IZZO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
ROSENBERG KLEIN & LEE ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 015 | PERCUSSION INSTRUMENTS AND ACCESSORIES, NAMELY, TABORINS, BASS DRUMS, DRUMSTICKS FOR DRUMS, DRUMSTICKS FOR TABOR DRUMS USED BY CHILDREN, JEWS HARPS, BONGO DRUMS, RATTLES, NYLON REEDS FOR WOODWIND MOUTHPIECES, TAMBOURINES, DRUMHEADS, STRAPS FOR GUITARS, STRAPS FOR SAXOPHONES; PERCUSSION INSTRUMENT PRODUCING GRUNTING SOUNDS, NAMELY, CUICA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 6, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 1, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 23, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 19, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |