USPTO serial 78606464
BIGGS & FEATHERBELLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAYES, GINA CLARK
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BIGGS & FEATHERBELLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
VASILIOS PEROS
Vasilios Peros Law Office of Vasilios Peros, P.C.25 S. Charles St., Ste. 1400Baltimore, MD 21201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | LIP BALMS; SKIN LOTIONS; SKIN CREAMS; HAIR SHAMPOOS; HAIR CONDITIONERS; DEODORANTS FOR PERSONAL USE; DEODORANTS AND ANTIPERSPIRANTS; ANTIPERSPIRANTS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 3, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 3, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 4, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 4, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 20, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 6, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 30, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 24, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 4, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 11, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 22, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 22, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |