CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MONETIZED CRM SOLUTION

USPTO serial 78606537

MONETIZED CRM SOLUTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BHANOT, KAPIL KUMAR
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MONETIZED CRM SOLUTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ketan S. Vakil

Ketan S. Vakil SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.600 Anton BoulevardSuite 1400Costa Mesa, CA 92626

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Advertising and marketingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 13, 2008PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Jan 25, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jan 8, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 4, 2008MREINOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED—
Jan 3, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2008EX2MSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
Jan 3, 2008EX2DSOU EXTENSION 2 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Dec 18, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Dec 18, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 3, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 14, 2007RGEXREINSTATEMENT GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Nov 14, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Nov 13, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 14, 2007ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 14, 2007REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 14, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 14, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 6, 2006WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Nov 6, 2006WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Aug 22, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 2, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 29, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 23, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 12, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Jun 12, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 10, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 5, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 5, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance