USPTO serial 78606571
SL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Young-suh Koo
Kristina M. Foudray Hamre, Schumann, Mueller & Larson, P.C.P.O. Box 2902Minneapolis, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lamp reflectors; light emitting devices for boats, namely, navigation lights, headlights and running lights; reflectors for boats; light emitting devices for aircrafts, namely, navigation lights and headlights; reflectors for aircrafts; light emitting devices for railway vehicles, namely, headlights and turn-signal light bulbs; reflectors for railway vehicles; motorcycle headlights; lights for automobiles; reflectors for automobiles; turn-signal light bulbs for automobiles; discharge lamps and their fittings; headlights for automobiles; bicycle lights; lamps for license plate of automobiles; rear lights and tail lights for automobiles; and fog lamps for automobiles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 2008 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 20, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 2, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | LIEC | LEGAL INSTRUMENT EXAMINER (LIE) - CORRECTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |