Where is the live CopyMark page for USPTO serial 78606642?

The live record is at https://getcopymark.com/trademark/78606642. Use https://getcopymark.com/trademark/{serialNumber} for any 8-digit USPTO serial.

Who owns SENIORMEDHELP?

According to the public USPTO record for serial number 78606642, the listed owner(s) include: Meyer, Marsha J..

What is USPTO serial number 78606642?

Serial number 78606642 is the USPTO application identifier for the mark SENIORMEDHELP. It is used to track examination, publication, and registration of this trademark.

What is the current status of SENIORMEDHELP?

SENIORMEDHELP (78606642) currently shows USPTO status code 603 on the public record. This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Which trademark classes cover SENIORMEDHELP?

The public record lists International Classes: 041. Each class corresponds to categories of goods or services identified in the application or registration.

USPTO serial 78606642

SENIORMEDHELP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603

Filing date: Apr 12, 2005
Status date: Apr 7, 2008
Registration date: —
Examiner: CAPSHAW, DANIEL
Law office: TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SENIORMEDHELP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner

Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.

Trademark Monitoring

(312) 319-4460

Not the owner?

File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Start a new application

(312) 319-4460

Owner

Meyer, Marsha J.
Irvine, CA
Other trademarks owned by Meyer, Marsha J.

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Venus Griffith Trunnel, Grant J. Hallstrom

Venus Griffith Trunnel, Grant J. Hallstr Hallstrom, Klein & Ward LLP Bus.Law.Ctr15615 Alton ParkwaySuite 175Irvine, CA 92618

Goods and services

Class	Description	Status	First use
041	Education services, namely, providing customized classes, seminars, individual training sessions and workshops to senior citizens in the field of medication management	ACTIVE	Oct 18, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Date	Code	Event	What it means
Apr 30, 2008	MAB3	ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Apr 7, 2008	ABN3	ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL	—
Apr 7, 2008	EXPT	EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED	—
Feb 20, 2008	EXFB	EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF	—
Aug 22, 2007	GEA1	NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Aug 22, 2007	GECD	ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED	—
Aug 22, 2007	CNCF	ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED	—
Aug 1, 2007	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
Aug 1, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jul 30, 2007	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 30, 2007	TCCA	TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED	—
Jul 30, 2007	EXPI	EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED	—
Jul 30, 2007	JURT	JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY	—
Jul 30, 2007	EXAF	EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB	—
Jan 30, 2007	GNFR	FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 30, 2007	CNFR	FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN	A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 10, 2007	ACEC	AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED	—
Jan 10, 2007	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
Jan 9, 2007	ALIE	ASSIGNED TO LIE	—
Dec 6, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 9, 2006	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 2006	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 19, 2006	CHAN	APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED	—
May 19, 2006	TEME	TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED	—
May 3, 2006	CRFA	CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE	—
May 3, 2006	ARAA	ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 3, 2006	REAP	TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED	—
May 3, 2006	TROA	TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED	This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2005	GNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 8, 2005	CNRT	NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN	A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 7, 2005	DOCK	ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER	—
Apr 19, 2005	NWAP	NEW APPLICATION ENTERED	—