USPTO serial 78606744
JBL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAHRENKOPF, PAUL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JBL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lauren A. Dienes-Middlen
Christopher M. Verdini, Esq. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis LLPHenry W. Oliver Building535 Smithfield StreetPittsburgh, PA 152222Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper hangtags, cardboard hangtags; packaging, namely, blister cards, paper for wrapping and packaging, paper pouches for packaging, plastic bags for packaging, plastic bubble packs for wrapping or packaging; collector albums, namely, for sticker collectable cards, photo collectables; labels, namely, printed paper labels, printed shipping labels; folders; plastic bags for general use; paper tableware, namely, paper place mats, paper table mats, paper table linens; stickers; framed pictures; pens; pencils; posters; notebooks; trading cards; calendars; paper tablecloths; photographs; chalk; brochures, magazines, and newspapers concerning sports entertainment; photographic prints; postcards; greeting cards; pictures; decals; temporary tattoo transfers; coloring books; children's activity books; souvenir programs concerning sports entertainment; books featuring pictorial biographies; comic books; book covers; paper book markers; bookplates; paper lunch bags; paper napkins; picture books; sticker albums; memo pads; date books; address books; agenda books; pencil sharpeners; rubber stamps; stamp pads; collectible prepaid telephone cards not magnetically encoded; collector stamps, namely, commemorative stamp sheets; customized personal bank checks; checkbook covers and return address labels not of textile; paper banners; printed paper signs for doors; pencil cases; drawing rulers; erasers, namely, rubber erasers, chalk erasers, blackboard erasers; scribble pad; photo albums; bumper stickers; window decals; lithographs; paper party bags; paper party favors, namely, paper hats; stencils for tracing designs onto paper; paper gift wrap; paper cake decorations; all of the aforementioned goods to always refer to and/or promote the wrestling character known as JBL | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2012 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Oct 22, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 22, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 20, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2012 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2011 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 13, 2011 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 16, 2011 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 21, 2011 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 15, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 14, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 17, 2010 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 16, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2010 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 3, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 9, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 5, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 3, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 2, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 20, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 6, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 14, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |