Drawing for FAITH

USPTO serial 78606842

FAITH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FAITH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michelle R. Osinski

MICHELLE R OSINSKI DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC39577 WOODWARD AVE STE 300BLOOMFIELD HILLS, MI 48304-5086UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016General interest magazineACTIVEDec 8, 1999

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 30, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 15, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 8, 2006GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 8, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jun 20, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 10, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
May 10, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 16, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Mar 16, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 10, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 10, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 23, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 12, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 25, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 25, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 19, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance