USPTO serial 78607029
VALENTIN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VALENTIN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stewart J. Bellus
STEWART J BELLUS & AIMEE L KAPLAN COLLARD & ROE PC1077 NORTHERN BLVDROSLYN, NY 11576UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | CHEMICAL PRODUCTS FOR AGRICULTURAL, HORTICULTURAL AND FORESTRY PURPOSES, NAMELY, FERTILIZERS; POTASH SOAP FOR PLANT PROTECTION AND PLANT CARE, ESPECIALLY AS GLOSS AGENT FOR LEAVES; FLOWER SOIL, HUMUS | ABANDONED | — |
| 003 | Washing powders and liquids and bleaching preparations for household use; all purpose cleaners; all purpose cleaners containing oil-removing agents; detergent and disinfectant soaps | ABANDONED | — |
| 005 | Preparations for destroying vermin; fungicides, insecticides and preparations for destroying parasites | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 13, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 11, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 7, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 2, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |