Drawing for LIQUID GLOVE

USPTO serial 78607637

LIQUID GLOVE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LIQUID GLOVE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory C. Smith

GREGORY C SMITH GARVEY, SMITH, NEHRBASS & DOODY LLC3838 N CAUSEWAY BLVD STE 3290METAIRIE, LA 70002-8350UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
021soft fabric mitt worn on the hand for dispensing a fluid, namely, a liquid or powder, onto a surface and contained within a fluid distribution pocketACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 25, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 25, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 30, 2007EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 10, 2007RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Apr 10, 2007CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Feb 2, 2007EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 2, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 2, 2007EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 2, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Oct 2, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 13, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 2, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 13, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 11, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 22, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 21, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 20, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jan 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 10, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 20, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance