USPTO serial 78608577
WELDING SERVICES INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, JENNIFER MCGARRY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WELDING SERVICES INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan K. Waldrop
Jennifer B. Moore and Russell P. Beets Greenberg Traurig, LLPThe Forum, Suite 4003290 Northside ParkwayAtlanta, GA 30327Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Mechanical maintenance services to the nuclear and non-nuclear power, chemical, petrochemical, pulp and paper, steel, metal and similar heavy industries, namely, maintenance of major mechanical components critical to the production process in each of these industries; repair, refurbishing, modification, and replacement services relating to major mechanical components and parts critical to the production process in the nuclear and non-nuclear power, chemical, petrochemical, pulp and paper, steel, metal, and similar heavy industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 25, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 10, 2008 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 20, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 13, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2007 | RGRR | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 5, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 26, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 7, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |