CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for READY CASE

USPTO serial 78608583

READY CASE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with READY CASE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William P. Bray

WILLIAM P BRAY THE BRAY LAW FIRM4701 HEDGEMORE DR STE 816CHARLOTTE, NC 28209UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Personal emergency evacuation kits composed of the following items that are useful in an emergency, namely, radios, safety whistles, first aid kits, bottled water, dust masks and/or respiratory masks for non-medical purposes, granola-based snack bars, freeze-dried food packages, emergency ponchos, thermal blanketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2010MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 19, 2010ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 15, 2009NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 23, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 3, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 19, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 18, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 11, 2009XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
May 11, 2009GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2009GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
May 11, 2009CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
May 7, 2009RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 4, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
May 2, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Nov 1, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Aug 29, 2007ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 23, 2007IROARESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED—
May 23, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 4, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 25, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 25, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 20, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 31, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 10, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 10, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 9, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 9, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 19, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 12, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 21, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance