USPTO serial 78608887
SMOKEFREE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3235444Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 24, 2007
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMOKEFREE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig M. Scott
Craig M. Scott Scott & Bush Ltd.30 Kennedy Plaza4th FloorProvidence, RI 02903Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | Health care services, namely assisting individuals to stop smoking; providing health information; providing counseling services in the field of health | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 29, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 21, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 24, 2007 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Mar 15, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 13, 2007 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 11, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2007 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |