USPTO serial 78608959
SPERRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPERRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Carolyn S. Waldo
JEFFREY J. LOOK LOOK LAW FIRM PLLCPO BOX 364EUDORA, AR 71640UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Oil, gas, water, and geothermal well drilling services, namely, well drilling and bore hole drilling; directional drilling for oil, gas, water and geothermal well drilling; Oil, gas, water and geothermal well drilling services, namely, measurement while drilling (MWD) services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | Core analysis services for oil, gas, water and geothermal well field exploration; geological surveying for oil, gas, water, and geothermal well field exploration; well logging for oil, gas, water, and geothermal well prospecting; analysis services for oil, gas, and geothermal well field services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 9, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 9, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |