USPTO serial 78609318
BLINK DIGITAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KING, CHRISTINA B
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLINK DIGITAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
HOLLYWOOD, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
SANTA MONICA, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew N. Spivak
Andrew N. Spivak Mosaic Legal Group, PLLC5185 MacArthur Boulevard, NW, Suite 350Washington, DC 20016-3341UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | DISTRIBUTORSHIP SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS; ON- AND OFF-LINE AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA ASSET MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS, namely, business management of tasks and decisions surrounding ingesting, annotating, cataloguing, storage, retrieval and distribution of audiovisual media assets, and up- and downloading, renaming, backing up, rating, grouping, archiving, optimizing, maintaining, thinning, importing and exporting audiovisual media and data files; PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR OTHERS FOR BUSINESS PURPOSES FOR MOTION PICTURE, FILM, VIDEO, DIGITAL VERSATILE DISC AND AUDIO PRODUCTION PROJECTS; DVD CONTENT ACQUISITION, NAMELY, COMMERCIAL ADMINISTRATION OF THE LICENSING OF MULTIMEDIA CONTENT FOR USE IN DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | CONTRACT MANUFACTURING IN THE FIELD OF DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS; COMPRESSION OF VIDEO AND AUDIO SIGNALS; TELECINE AND FORMAT CONVERSION SERVICES FOR FILM AND VIDEO, NAMELY, VIDEO TRANSFER SERVICES, PROVIDING COLOR CORRECTION AND CONVERSION OF MOTION PICTURE FILM TO VIDEO FILM; PRODUCTION OF DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS, NAMELY, DISC MANUFACTURING SERVICES FOR OTHERS, DIGITAL COMPRESSION OF DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT RELATED TO THE PRODUCTION OF DIGITAL VERSATILE DISC-BASED MULTIMEDIA CONTENT | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | PRODUCTION SERVICES, NAMELY, VIDEO AND AUDIO MEDIA PRODUCTION SERVICES; DIGITAL VERSATILE DISC MASTERING SERVICES; DUPLICATION AND REPLICATION OF DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS; POST-PRODUCTION SERVICES FOR AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA, NAMELY, DOWN SAMPLING AND ON- AND OFF-LINE DIGITAL PROCESSING OF VIDEO AND AUDIO SIGNALS; PRODUCTION OF SOUND EFFECTS, SOUND EFFECTS EDITING, AND FOLEY EDITING AND FOLEY PRODUCTION SERVICES FOR FILM AND VIDEO; OFF-LINE AUDIO EDITING SERVICES FOR AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA PRODUCTION, NAMELY, AUTOMATED DIALOGUE REPLACEMENT AND AUDIO RE-RECORDING SERVICES, ALL FOR FILM, TELEVISION, INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA, AND VIDEOGAME PRODUCTIONS; CONSULTING SERVICES FOR MOTION PICTURE, FILM, VIDEO, DIGITAL VERSATILE DISC AND AUDIO PRODUCTION PROJECTS; STORY, CONCEPT, LAYOUT AND PLOTLINE DEVELOPMENT AND GRAPHICS, EFFECTS AND AUDIOVISUAL PROGRAMMING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF INTERACTIVE MEDIA CONTENT PRODUCTION AND DESIGN; AUDIO RECORDING AND PRODUCTION SERVICES; POST-PRODUCTION EDITING SERVICES FOR MOTION PICTURE, FILM, TELEVISION, VIDEO, AUDIO, DIGITAL VERSATILE DISC AND INTERACTIVE MEDIA; POST-PRODUCTION EDITING OF MULTIMEDIA CONTENT FOR DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | QUALITY CONTROL FOR OTHERS OF THE DUPLICATION, REPLICATION AND DISTRIBUTION OF DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS; TELECINE AND FORMAT-CONVERSION SERVICES FOR FILM AND VIDEO, NAMELY, PHYSICAL CONVERSION SERVICES FROM ONE MEDIA TO ANOTHER; FORMAT CONVERSION SERVICES FOR ANALOG AND DIGITAL AUDIO, NAMELY, PHYSICAL CONVERSION SERVICES FROM ONE MEDIA TO ANOTHER; INTERACTIVE APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT, NAMELY, SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT FOR INTERACTIVE MULTIMEDIA PRODUCTS; DIGITAL VERSATILE DISC AUTHORING; CROSS-PLATFORM CONVERSION OF DIGITAL CONTENT INTO OTHER FORMS OF DIGITAL CONTENT; VIDEO-ON-DEMAND ENCODING SERVICES, NAMELY, DIGITAL ENCODING OF MEDIA CONTENT FOR VIDEO-ON-DEMAND DELIVERY SERVICES; PRODUCTION OF DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS, NAMELY, FORMATTING OF DIGITAL MEDIA CONTENT RELATED TO THE PRODUCTION OF DIGITAL VERSATILE DISC-BASED MULTIMEDIA CONTENT; PRODUCTION OF DIGITAL VERSATILE DISCS, NAMELY, CONTENT ACQUISITION SERVICES FOR OTHERS, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC ACQUISITION OF VARIOUSLY STORED AND FORMATTED MEDIA CONTENT FOR OTHERS AND PREPARATION THEREOF FOR DIGITAL VERSATILE DISC FORMATS; FORMAT CONVERSION SERVICES FOR ANALOG AND DIGITAL AUDIO, NAMELY, FORMAT CONVERSION OF DIGITAL AND ANALOG AUDIO DATA FOR AND AMONG DIFFERENT MEDIA DELIVERY PLATFORMS; PREPARATION OF AUDIOVISUAL MEDIA, NAMELY, TELEVISION AND FILM PROGRAMS, FOR STREAMING DELIVERY, NAMELY, FORMATTING, SUBCODE DATA INSERTION, INSERTION OF COMMERCIAL MESSAGES AND CUE DATA FOR SAME | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DELUXE MEDIA GROUP LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ASCENT MEDIA GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by ASCENT MEDIA GROUP, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Ascent Media Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named BLINK DIGITAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Apr 11, 2011 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 11, 2011 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 19, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 12, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 5, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 7, 2010 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 29, 2010 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2010 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 3, 2010 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2010 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2010 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 18, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 4, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 9, 2009 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 26, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 2009 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 6, 2009 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 5, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 26, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 16, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 7, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2008 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 12, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 11, 2007 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 3, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 3, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |