USPTO serial 78609823
SAPPE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAPPE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Kashman
DAVID S KASHMAN GOTTLIEB, RACKMAN & REISMAN PC270 MADISON AVE 8TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | FROZEN PREPARED ORIENTAL ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF FISH, SEAFOOD OR VEGETABLES; FROZEN PREPARED THAI FOOD, NAMELY, FROZEN VEGETABLE PAD THAI, FROZEN SHRIMP PAD THAI, AND FROZEN FRIED FISH CAKES; COCONUT PRDUCTS, NAMELY, COCONUT MILK AND COCONUT JUICE | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | FROZEN AND DRY PREPARED ORIENTAL ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF NOODLES OR RICE; DRY AND FROZEN PREPARED THAI FOOD, NAMELY, DRY PAD THAI NOODLES, FROZEN VEGETABLE FRIED RICE,AND FROZEN SHRIMP FRIED RICE | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NAMELY, PINEAPPLE JUICE AND ALOE VERA JUICE | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |