USPTO serial 78610288
ROYALTYSHARE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2009
- Examiner
- FRIEDMAN, HOWARD
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with ROYALTYSHARE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business management services, namely, compiling, tracking and managing information about ownership rights, license rights and revenue allocation rights in intellectual property, copyrights, theatrical, literary, music, video, film and other licensed rights; accounting services rendered to owners, licensors, licensees and users of intellectual property rights; royalty accounting and business management services relating to digital, royalty and other licensed rights in the field of entertainment, theater, the arts, music, film, literature and publishing of all types | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2005 |
| 036 | Financial management and/or consulting services rendered to owners, licensors, licensees and users of intellectual property rights | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2019 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 19, 2019 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 19, 2019 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2019 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2017 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 24, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2015 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| May 15, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 14, 2009 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 14, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2009 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 24, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2009 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2007 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 29, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 14, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 5, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |