USPTO serial 78610410
OPTIQAIR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- May 29, 2007
- Examiner
- FRAZIER, TAMARA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with OPTIQAIR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
FIBER LOGIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
HSINCHU, TW
FIBER LOGIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
HSINCHU, TW
FIBER LOGIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
HSINCHU, TW
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MORTON J. ROSENBERG
MORTON J. ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CENTER DRIVE-SUITE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | OPTICAL FIBER SIGNAL TRANSMISSION MACHINE; OPTICAL FIBER SIGNAL REGENERATOR; OPTICAL FIBER SIGNAL RECEIVER; OPTICAL FIBER COMMUNICATION MACHINE, NAMELY, SYNCHRONOUS DIGITAL HIERARCHY ADD/DROP MULTIPLEXER, OPTICAL MODEM FOR USE WITH OPTICAL FIBER, OPTICAL SIGNAL REPEATER; COAXIAL CABLE SIGNAL CARRIER; SIGNAL RECEIVER; PULSE CODE MODULATION SIGNAL CARRIER, NAMELY TL/EL LEASE LINE EQUIPMENT, NAMELY, MULTIPLEXERS AND MODEMS; SIGNAL INTENSIFIER; SOUND AMPLIFIER; RADIO TRANSMITTER; ELECTRONIC SWITCH; TELECOMMUNICATION MACHINE, NAMELY, FACSIMILE MACHINE; COMPUTER PROGRAMS FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND AS A SPREADSHEET; COMPUTER FIRMWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND FOR USE AS A SPREADSHEET; COMPUTER NETWORK CONTROLLER, NAMELY, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; TELEPHONE SWITCH; AUTOMATIC CIRCUIT SENSOR; NETWORK INTERFACE CARDS FOR INTERFACING A COMPUTER TO A LOCAL OR GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; HUB FOR NETWORKING COMPUTERS; ROUTER FOR INTERFACING A COMPUTER OR A LOCAL AREA COMPUTER NETWORK TO A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; NETWORK GATEWAY; NETWORK BRIDGE; INTERNET PHONE; MODULATOR AND DEMODULATOR MODEM; TELECOM TRANSMISSION MULTIPLEXER; TELECOM TRANSMISSION CONCENTRATOR; NETWORK TRANSMISSION MULTIPLEXER; NETWORK TRANSMISSION CONCENTRATOR | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Aug 1, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by FIBER LOGIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FIBER LOGIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by FIBER LOGIC COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named OPTIQAIR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 5, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 29, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Dec 6, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 9, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 5, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 13, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 29, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Nov 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |