Drawing for BRINSPECTOR

USPTO serial 78610559

BRINSPECTOR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BLOHM, LINDA
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BRINSPECTOR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Gregory T. Ourada

Gregory T. Ourada Hill, Kertscher & Wharton, LLP3350 Riverwood ParkwaySuite 800Atlanta, GA 30339

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software, namely, electronic-forms tool for creating forms on PDA for the purpose of conducting fire and life safety systemsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 18, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 18, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Dec 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 11, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 17, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 28, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Nov 29, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 18, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 15, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 15, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Nov 15, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Apr 25, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance