USPTO serial 78611785
GO HAWAII
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPILS, CAROL A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GO HAWAII?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William J. McNally, Esq.
WILLIAM J MCNALLY ESQ4 MEADOW VIEW RDHINGHAM, MA 02043-2936UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Cards, which are not magnetically coded, for use in business transactions, namely, enabling admission to attractions and offering savings on shopping, dining and travel | ABANDONED | Oct 18, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 27, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 8, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 3, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 2, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |