USPTO serial 78612381
ACCELLON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCELLON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Computer code conversion for others; Computer consultation; Computer diagnostic services; Computer disaster recovery planning; Computer graphics services; Computer hardware development; Computer network design for others; Computer project management services; Computer security service, namely, restricting access to and by computer networks to and of undesired web sites, media and individuals and facilities; Computer services, namely, creating and maintaining web sites for others; Computer services, namely, data recovery services; Computer services, namely, redirecting electronic mail to changed personal electronic address; Computer services, namely, filtering of unwanted e-mails; Computer services, namely monitoring and reporting on the performance, availability, and errors of websites of others; Computer services, namely monitoring, testing, analyzing, and reporting on the Internet traffic control and content control of the websites of others; Computer site design; Computer software design, computer programming, or maintenance of computer software; Computer systems analysis; Computer virus protection services; Customization of computer hardware and software; Data conversion of computer program data or information not physical conversion, e;g; photographs to CD-ROMs; Design and maintenance of computer sites for third parties; Design of computers for others; Development of computer programs recorded on data media (software) designed for use in construction and automated manufacturing (cad/cam); Displaying the web sites and images of others on a computer server; Installation of computer software; Integration of computer systems and networks; Monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes and providing back-up computer programs and facilities; On-line batch computer services; Providing a website that features information on computer technology and programming | ABANDONED | Apr 30, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Aug 22, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 2, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 24, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 15, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |