USPTO serial 78612396
DEEPLOOK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEEPLOOK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | software; scientific apparatus; asset tracking devices; asset tracking software; devices for tracking humans; devices for tracking mobile platforms; devices for tracking assets within enclosed buildings and structures; GPS devices; intertial sensors; gyroscopes; accelerometers; RF transceivers; computer processors; computer interfaces; computer network interfaces; scientific, apparatus and instruments; data processing equipment and computers; software; computer hardware; software and hardware for monitoring tracking devices; software and hardware for security chain applications; software and hardware for safety devices; software and hardware for supply chain applications; data processing instruments and apparatus; software and hardware for monitoring maritime assets and cargo containers; software and hardware for monitoring hazardous response personnel and assets; software and hardware for RFID; scientific and technological services and research and design relating thereto; industrial analysis and research services; design and development of computer hardware and software; research and development services for others; software and hardware services relating to monitoring tracking devices, security chain applications, safety devices, supply chain applications, data processing instruments and apparatus, monitoring maritime assets and cargo containers, monitoring hazardous response personnel and assets, RFID applications | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 10, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 22, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 16, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 16, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |