USPTO serial 78612404
WAVE MOBILIZATION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3577883Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 2009
- Examiner
- LAMOTHE, LESLEY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with WAVE MOBILIZATION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Institute of Orthopedic Massage
Kensington, CA
HENDRICKSON METHOD INSTITUTE, INC.
KENSINGTON, CA
Other trademarks owned by HENDRICKSON METHOD INSTITUTE, INC.
HENDRICKSON METHOD INSTITUTE, INC.
KENSINGTON, CA
Other trademarks owned by HENDRICKSON METHOD INSTITUTE, INC.
Institute of Orthopedic Massage
Kensington, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Connie L. Ellerbach, Esq., Linda M. Goldman, Esq.
Connie L. Ellerbach, Esq., Linda M. Goldman, Esq. Fenwick & West LLP801 California StreetSilicon Valley CenterMountain View, CA 94041-1990Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 044 | PHYSICAL THERAPY; ORTHOPEDIC THERAPY; CLINICAL MASSAGE; ORTHOPEDIC MASSAGE; MANUAL THERAPY; EXERCISE AND REHABILITATION THERAPY BY MEANS OF SPECIAL MASSAGE TECHNIQUES | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 24, 2006 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Institute of Orthopedic Massage
- Other trademarks owned by HENDRICKSON METHOD INSTITUTE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by HENDRICKSON METHOD INSTITUTE, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Institute of Orthopedic Massage
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named WAVE MOBILIZATION
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 20, 2019 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 17, 2018 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 27, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 10, 2014 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 12, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2009 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2009 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 5, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 24, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 5, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Dec 31, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 28, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 5, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |