USPTO serial 78613051
DOMESTIX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DOMESTIX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Broccolo
Andrew J. Broccolo Topco Holdings, Inc.150 Northwest Point Blvd.Elk Grove Village, IL 60007UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Culinary utensils, namely, knives, forks, and spoons, fruit corers, lemon zesters, all-purpose peelers, namely non-electric fruit and vegetable peelers, cheese slicers, egg slicers, fruit slicers, hand operated all-purpose slicers, non-electric can openers, pizza cutters | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Measuring cups, measuring spoons, measuring bowls, kitchen timers, food thermometers, food scales | ACTIVE | — |
| 021 | Double boilers, casseroles, stir fry's, namely, non-electric woks, griddles, tea kettles, jelly roll pans, meatloaf pans, colanders, strainers; household gadgets, namely, spatulas, turners, slotted spatulas and tongs; cooking spoons, namely, basting spoons, mixing spoons, serving spoons and slotted spoons; serving utensils, namely, forks, ladles, mashers, pasta spoons, all-purpose scrapers, cookie cutters and ice cream scoops, pastry blenders, basting brushes, pastry brushes, basters, handheld wire whips, citrus juicers, garlic presses, melon ballers, box graters, flat graters, rotary graters, salt and pepper mills, pitchers, bottle openers; wine bottle openers, sugar shakers | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Topco Associates, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Topco Associates, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 021
- Similar marks named DOMESTIX
- Prosecution event ARAA explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 4, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 4, 2018 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 11, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 10, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 2009 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 18, 2009 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2009 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 18, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 26, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 2007 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | GECG | ACTION GRANTING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 5, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2005 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2005 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |