Drawing for PUREACTIV PRO

USPTO serial 78613195

PUREACTIV PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEATING, MICHAEL P
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PUREACTIV PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kimberley Cunningham and Lorraine Pinsent

KIMBERLEY CUNNINGHAM & LORRAINE PINSEN BENNETT JONES LLP1000 ATCO CTR 10035 105 STEDMONTON, AB T5J 3T2CANADA

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER HARDWARE, VIDEO AND PHOTOGRAPHIC HARDWARE, NAMELY, VIDEO CAMERAS, DIGITAL CAMERAS AND DIGITAL VIDEO RECORDERS, AND COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN REAL TIME SECURITY SURVEILLANCE AND MONITORING INPUT FROM VIDEO CAMERAS AND MOTION DETECTORSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 13, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 10, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 10, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 24, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 31, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 31, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
May 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 19, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 19, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2005NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance